|
Biblical
references in Gahanna-Jefferson Church of Christ's nondenominational sermon
outlines are linked directly to text of the King James version of the Bible.
Bible quotes you hear in the streaming audio may be from the New King James
version of the Bible.
Click Here To Start Audio
Introduction.
1. In 2 Peter 3:15-16, Peter mentions that Paul wrote some things that were hard to
understand.
2. The same could be said about some of Peter’s own writings, especially the
passage in 1 Peter 3:18-20.
3. Considered by some to be one of the most difficult passages in the Bible,
various and sometimes fanciful interpretations have been given.
4. In a lesson designed to inform rather than exhort:
a. We shall examine several of the interpretations that have been offered.
b. And suggest which one seems to be the right one (to me, at least).
Body.
I. THE VIEW OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA (200 A.D.)
A. Basic Elements.
1. That Christ when to hell in His spirit between His death and His resurrection.
2. That He proclaimed the message of salvation to the souls of sinners
imprisoned there since the flood.
B. Major Difficulties.
1. This view would suggest that for some reason these souls were given a second
chance.
2. Whereas the Bible consistently teaches against such an idea.
a. it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment -
Hebrews 9:27
b. Peter himself later wrote that the wicked souls before the flood were being
reserved under punishment for the day of judgment -
2 Peter 2:4-5, 9
3. Why would people before the flood be given a second chance when those after
the flood are not?
II. THE VIEW OF AUGUSTINE (400 A.D.)
A. Basic Elements.
1. That the preexistent Christ in His spirit proclaimed salvation through Noah
to the people who lived before the flood.
a. We know that Noah was a preacher of righteousness in his day -
2 Peter 2:5
b. We know that the Spirit of Christ was at work in O.T. prophets -
1 Peter 1:10-11
2. This view is held by many brethren today.
B. Major Difficulties.
1. The wording of Peter would more naturally suggest that he is speaking of:
a. The Christ who was put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit.
b. The crucified and resurrected Christ, not the pre-incarnate Christ.
2. Also, the wording would more naturally suggest the preaching occurred:
a. To the spirits in prison, not before they were imprisoned.
b. When they formerly were disobedient, not during their disobedience.
3. Augustine’s view dominated the theological scene for centuries, but then
other views were presented.
III.THE VIEW OF CARDINAL BELLARMINE (1600 A.D.)
A. Basic Elements.
1. That in His spirit Christ went to release the souls of the righteous who
repented before the flood and had been kept in limbo.
2. In Catholic theology, limbo is the place between heaven and hell, where the
souls of the OT saints were kept.
B. Major Difficulties.
1. The Bible is silent about a place such as limbo.
2. The spirits under discussion by Peter were disobedient in the days of Noah.
a. According to Genesis 6:5-13;
7:1, only Noah and his family were righteous.
b. If others had repented, would they not also have been on the ark?
3. There were no righteous before the flood save Noah and his family!
IV. THE VIEW OF FRIEDRICH SPITTA (1900 A.D.)
A. Basic Elements.
1. After His death and before His resurrection, Christ preached to fallen
angels, also known as sons of God, who during Noah’s time had married daughters
of men.
2. This view is based upon a particular interpretation of
Genesis 6:1-4.
a. Job 1:6;
2:1 is offered as evidence that angels are sometimes referred to as
sons of God.
b. Jude 6, also, is offered as referring to fallen angels in the days of Noah.
1) Because it sounds very similar to references in a book called I Enoch.
2) Which expounds on the idea that the sons of God in
Genesis 6 were fallen angels.
3) And Jude seems to quote directly from this book in
Jude 14-15.
c. Josephus, a Jewish historian born in 37 A.D., took a similar view of
Genesis 6.
3. This view is held by many Protestant scholars.
B. Major Difficulties.
1. In responding to the Sadducees, Jesus taught that angels of God do not marry
- Matthew 22:30
2. Of course, Jesus may have been referring to angels who keep their proper
domain, and do not leave their own habitation.
a. If righteous angels could temporarily take on human form to deliver God’s
message (as in the case described in
Genesis 18:1-8;
19:1-3) where they ate food.
b. It might have been possible for fallen angels to take on human form and
cohabitate as some believe
Genesis 6 suggests.
3. But it just as feasible to understand
Genesis 6 differently:
a. That the sons of God were the descendants of Seth (i.e., godly people), and
the daughters of men were descendants of Cain (ungodly people).
b. This view stays clear of speculation which can easily take on mythological
proportions!
V. THE VIEW OF SOME CONTEMPORARY COMMENTATORS.
A. Basic Elements.
1. That the resurrected Christ, when He ascended into heaven, proclaimed to
imprisoned spirits his victory over death.
2. That the exalted Christ passed through the realm where the fallen angels are
kept and proclaimed His triumph over them (Ephesians 6:12;
Colossians 2:15 is offered as
support for this view).
3. This interpretation has met favorable response in Protestant and Roman
Catholic circles.
4. More importantly, this view is in beautiful harmony with Peter’s wording and
context.
B. Major Distinctions.
1. The preaching was made by Jesus Himself (not through Noah).
2. The preaching was made by Jesus after “being put to death in the flesh (not
in His pre-incarnate form).
3. The preaching was made by Jesus after He was made alive by the Spirit (i.e.,
after His resurrection, not during the three day period between death and
resurrection).
4. The preaching was made to the spirits.
a. Not to the spirits of men (which is how the souls or spirits of men are
commonly referred to, notice
Hebrews 12:23;
Revelation 6:9;
20:4).
b. But rather to angelic spirits.
5. The preaching was made to them in prison (that there are angels so bound is
clearly taught in 2
Peter 2:4 and Jude 6).
6. The preaching was made to them who were formerly disobedient...in the days of
Noah.
a. This view does not require that the rebellious angels were the sons of God in
Genesis 6.
b. But simply were somehow disobedient at that time.
7. The preaching was a proclamation of victory over death, not an offer of a
second chance to a select few!
Conclusion.
1. As suggested, this last view is not only in harmony with the very words and
grammatical constructions used by Peter, but it is harmony with the context.
a. Peter had been teaching us to be willing to suffer, if necessary, for doing
good - 1 Peter 3:17
b. He appeals to the example of Christ -
1 Peter 3:18a
c. Who despite His suffering and death, was made alive, proclaimed victory to
those spirits who had not been willing to submit to God in Noah’s day, ascending
to the right hand of God, over all angels and authorities! -
1 Peter 3:18b-20, note
especially v.22.
d. In view of Jesus’ triumph over suffering, we should be willing to do the
same! - 1 Peter 4:1
2. Admittedly, this passage is difficult, so one needs to be careful and not
dogmatic in one’s treatment of it.
3. I hope that by presenting this survey of the various views it may serve
helpful in drawing your own conclusions about Peter’s perplexing passage.
4. But one thing Peter mentions in this passage that is not perplexing is his
reference to baptism, and it’s necessity for salvation (1
Peter 3:21).
Don Treadway,
December 2003 |
